logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.06.20 2018구합85426
의사면허자격정지처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition suspending the qualification of a dentist against the Plaintiff on October 1, 2018 is revoked.

2...

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff is a dentist who opened and operated a “Cental” on the fourth floor of the Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B building (hereinafter “instant dental license”).

On February 12, 2015, the Plaintiff was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months and 2 years of suspension of execution as a result of the violation of the Medical Service Act, and the Plaintiff and the Prosecutor appealed against the suspension of execution. The Plaintiff appealed against the Plaintiff and the Prosecutor.

On May 14, 2015, the Plaintiff was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence) (joint residence intrusion), violation of the Public Official Qualification Act, intimidation, violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation), and the Plaintiff appealed.

On July 28, 2015, the appellate court (Korean Government District Court 2015No749, 2015No1452) found the Plaintiff guilty of all the criminal facts committed against the Plaintiff on July 28, 2015 by combining each of the above cases, reversed the judgment below as the ground for reversal ex officio and sentenced the Plaintiff to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and suspension of execution, three years and 25 million won and fine for negligence.

The above judgment became final and conclusive on August 5, 2015.

(hereinafter “Related criminal judgment”). Criminal facts concerning a violation of the Medical Service Act among the criminal facts in the relevant criminal judgment are as follows.

[2015 Height 29] The Plaintiff ordered the victim D, the owner of the building in which the instant dental surgery is located, to perform an falpt 4,200,000 won under the condition that D would be paid in a lump sum, but D would not pay D lump sum but make D an appraisal of D as a result of the monthly rent of the building due to D's failure to view D's failure to do so, and caused E to scam a scam for a scam with a scam, and scambling a scam by inserting it on March 21, 2013; and E, around March 21, 2013, after scaming the 47 Scam of the above D's d's d' d' d' d' d' d's d's d' d's d', and around April 2, 2014.

arrow