The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not violate the signal.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. We examine the argument of mistake of facts. The following circumstances are revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence legitimately adopted and examined at the court of the court below. ① The victim, from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court, tried to make a left-hand turn from the Etri-distance, was stopped, and the red signal was suspended. At the same time, the signal was suspended for more than two minutes, and the signal was reported to 119 as it was used on the side, and ② At the time of the accident, G waiting for the signal prior to the stop line due to the stop signal operated on the front side of the Maccom box, etc. from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court of the court of the court of the court of the court below, and, in light of the fact that the victim’s first communication signal was changed to the cross-signal signal installed at the intersection, the victim’s first statement was made after the passage of the police station and the victim’s first statement was made.