logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.08 2014고단189
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 189]

1. Larceny;

A. On December 27, 2013, the Defendant cited a 113,000 per cent of the market price owned by the victim, which was located on the display stand, in the victim D’s “E” store located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s Jung-gu located in “E” store for the victim D’s operation, and stolen it.

B. On December 28, 2013, from around December 28, 2013 to around the 30th of the same month, the Defendant: (a) cited one per 113,000 won of the market price owned by the victim, which was placed on the display stand in a crepan of employees’ attention at the “E” central point of the said victim’s operation located in Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul; and (b) continuously destroyed the victim’s market price by citing one per 59,000 won of the market price owned by the victim at the same place.

C. On December 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of the victim’s market price owned by the victim, which was located in the display stand, in the “E” store located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for the operation of the above victim’s “E” zone; (b) 113,000 won in the market price of the victim’s possession, which was located in the display stand.

On January 1, 2014, around 21:30 on January 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of the gap of employees’ attention at the “E” point of the operation of the above victim’s “E” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H by citing one per 113,000 won at the market price owned by another victim.

2. Fraud;

A. On January 1, 2014, around 19:48, the Defendant told the victim J, an employee of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul, to the effect that “E purchased a water at all times and want to return it.”

However, the fact that the return of the defendant demanded by the defendant was not the normal number of pages that the defendant purchased at the same time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant makes a false statement to the victim as above, 110,000 won as the cost of return from the victim, namely, the victim’s seat.

arrow