logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.07.24 2020고합117
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

The victim is 38 (1,90,000 won) out of 231 copies (No. 4) of the seized right of only 190,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 23, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (ththth thief) in resident support at the Daegu District Court. On January 14, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for the same crime at the Changwon District Court on August 16, 2012. On May 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for the same crime at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Incheon Northern Northern District Court 3rd 28 February 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 11, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 15:55 on May 11, 2020, in the “G gold room operated by the Victim D with E Underground Prize F, the Defendant: (b) took a theft by citing the precious metal of the sum of KRW 1,210,000 won of the market price of 6,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won

2. At around 13:07 on May 21, 2020, the Defendant, within the “IPC room” located on the third floor of H building in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, 2020, boomed and stolen a wall 1.9 million won in cash, which is one of the victims’ possession, of another.

3. On May 28, 2020, the Defendant, around 19:56, at the “K” page operated by the victim C of the Cheongju-si, a considerable amount of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, followed as if he would purchase a bring, worn a gold 15,000 won of the market price by using a 150,000 gold bring at the 4030,000 won, and then escaped out of the place to avoid a locking tobacco, and then cut off the victim’s divers of surveillance negligence.

Accordingly, the defendant was sentenced to punishment twice or more due to habitual larceny, etc., and again stolen the victims' property within three years after the execution of the sentence was completed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each statement set forth in D and B;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow