1. The defendant's notary public's joint law office against the plaintiff No. 95 prepared on November 5, 2009.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Since 2005, D has financed a business fund by lending the virtual coefficient mark issued by the Defendant from the Defendant and discounting it.

B. On November 5, 2009, D issued to the Defendant a promissory note No. 95 of 200,000 won at face value and on June 30, 2010 of the date of payment, and one promissory note No. 1 written in Seoul as joint and several surety, the Plaintiff, the place of issue, and the place of payment. On the same day, Cjoint and several offices were written by a notary public as to the said promissory note No. 95 of 2009 at the commission of D and the Defendant, the joint and several surety, the issuer and joint and several surety of the promissory note.

C. D from May 30, 2012, the household check which was due for the Defendant was not paid from May 30, 2012, and as a result, D was a total of KRW 120,000,000 for the household check which was due for the Defendant (section 24 of the household check which was due for the face value 5,000,000).

Since then, until December 19, 2014, the defendant received a total of KRW 108,416,577 as shown below from the plaintiff and D, and paid a total of KRW 11,58,483,423 as the principal of D's household checks.

On August 22, 2012, 140,00 D 40,00 40,000 40,000 3,000 18.3,001,170 17,31,010 3,31,010 3, 208, 36,56, 410 46, 17, 17, 206, 17, 206, 36, 47, 207, 17, 206, 36, 47, 17, 47, 206, 36, 47, 205, 17, 206, 30, 47, 205, 17, 208, 38, 380, 13,498, 198, 15, 2013, 194

E. The plaintiff is against the defendant while he fully repaid the household monetary debt that was jointly and severally guaranteed by the notarial deed of this case.