1. A notary public of November 5, 2009 against the Plaintiff’s Defendant, No. 95 of the New World Joint Law Office No. 2009.

1. Basic facts

A. C has been financed from around 2005 by lending the coefficient mark issued by the Defendant from the Defendant to discount it.

B. On November 5, 2009, in order to secure the repayment of the household check borrowed as above, C issued to the Defendant a promissory note No. 95 of 200,000 won at face value, and on June 30, 2010, as joint and several liability, the Plaintiff, the place of issue, and the place of payment of the promissory note in Seoul. On the same day, a notary public, at the commission of C and the Defendant, the agent who is the issuer and joint and several guarantor of the said promissory note, written a notarized deed of promissory note No. 95 of 2009 (hereinafter “instant authentic deed”).

C. C did not pay a household check which has come due from May 30, 2012 to the Defendant, and eventually C was a total of KRW 120,000,000 (in the face value, KRW 5,000,000).

Since then, until December 19, 2014, the Defendant received a total of KRW 108,416,577 as indicated below from the Plaintiff and C, and the principal of C’s household checks still remains in KRW 11,583,423.

On August 22, 2012, 140 C. 40,000 C. 40,000 total of eight checks, 3,001,170 on July 18, 2012, 203,31,010 on August 20, 2012, 36,30 on September 17, 2012, 30, 36,56, 47. 6. 17, 206, 17. 8, 206, 30, 47. 6. 17, 206, 30, 46. 17, 206, 46. 17, 30, 206, 50, 17. 16, 206, 50, 38, 380, 13, 498, 198, 15, 2013