Cases where there is an error of misapprehending the legal principles on formal effective requirements or registration of correction;

The registration of initial ownership or registration of transfer made on the building (number 1 omitted), which is (number 2 omitted), shall be null and void as there is no reason to distinguish between the substance and the substance to the extent sufficient to make the public in the actual relation of rights, and in such a case, it is not possible to permit the registration of initial revision, so even if the registration of initial revision was made on April 22, 75 (as the en banc Decision 74Da2188 delivered on April 22, 75).

Article 186 of the Civil Act, Article 71 of the Registration of Real Estate Act, Article 72 of the Registration of Real Estate Act

Plaintiff

Defendant

Busan District Court Decision 66Na339 delivered on February 8, 1967

We reverse the original judgment.

this case is remanded to Busan District Court Panel Division.

The defendant's attorney's grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, the court below acknowledged that the plaintiff's land number of the above building was on the ground (number 1 omitted) in Msan City, but the non-party 1, who was the original owner, obtained the ownership preservation registration as of May 19, 1956, the lot number of the above building was (number 2 omitted), and thereafter the ownership of the above building was transferred to non-party 2. The plaintiff purchased it from the above non-party 2 on February 23, 1966 and completed the registration of transfer of ownership on March 14 of the same year, which was consistent with the actual circumstances. Thus, the court below did not err in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the above building's ownership registration (number 1 omitted), and it cannot be seen that the plaintiff's ownership registration was valid after the correction of the registration number number number number of the above building (number 1 omitted) and it cannot be viewed that it was not consistent with the actual legal relationship.

The presiding judge of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) of the Red Marins (Presiding Justice)