logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.04 2017고합56
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2016, the Defendant driven a Drash car at around 20:00, while driving it on the front side of the road in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-do, led the Defendant to combine it with three national highways. Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) issued a warning to the victim G (the age of 41) who was in a direct progress, and driven a large-scale cargo vehicle on the front side of the road in Gwangju-si; (b) ordered the victim G (the age of 41) who was in a direct progress, to take a warning to sound the horn; and (c) caused the Defendant to stop the vehicle by making the victim under a sudden stop due to the sudden stop, and caused the Defendant to repair the damaged vehicle without stopping the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle; and (d) caused the damage to the damaged vehicle in the front part of the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property by using a dangerous object.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Notice of results of video appraisal by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office (including partial extension of CDs);

1. Written estimate;

1. Blue boxes and video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the scene of an accident, vehicle photographs, photographs of the accident vehicle, and photographic images of the black stuffs;

1. Relevant Article 369 of the Criminal Act; Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act regarding orders to provide community service and attend lectures

1. The summary of the argument does not want the victim immediately before the accident of this case by taking advantage of his left hand, but rather, by taking out three hand, such as the left hand, the inspection place, and the suspension, etc., of the victim's truck, which means that the victim is overtaking and passing first, and at the time, the victim's ordinary sound was driven by the driver in the process of reducing the speed of the vehicle according to the horse of the female-friendly her seat, and the accident of this case occurred. Thus, the defendant did not have any intention to damage special property.

2. Determination.

arrow