logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2020.10.29 2019가합11666
구상금
Text

The defendant's KRW 240,926,260 as well as 5% per annum from June 7, 2019 to October 29, 2020 to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1) D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”)

The main purpose of the complex transport arrangement business is a company that mainly aims at the complex transport arrangement business, and the plaintiff is an insurance company that has concluded an insurance contract with D. 2) The defendant is a company that mainly aims at the transport of goods.

Vehicles owned by the defendant are subscribed to E-Mutual Aid Association operated by the defendant's assistant intervenor.

B. F, D, Plaintiff’s legal relations 1) F, Inc. (hereinafter “F”).

On June 24, 2014, D entered into an agreement on transportation and customs consignment with D, and the said agreement has been renewed on a yearly basis. 2) D entered into an insurance contract with the Plaintiff on September 1, 2017 with the insurance coverage period from September 1, 2017 to August 31, 2019, with D and its affiliates.

According to the above insurance contract, the plaintiff compensates for losses or losses arising in connection with freight carriage between D and its affiliates.

C. (1) On October 2018, F is the window system that is kept in the warehouse of G institutions located at port at port to D around October 2018 (hereinafter “instant machine”).

) On October 28, 2018, D requested the instant machinery to transport the instant machinery from a warehouse to a wharf located only in the territory of the port at the port of call, and on October 29, 2018, D decided to transport the instant machinery to a warehouse of the G institution at the above wharf on October 29, 2018. 2) D identified the company to be in charge of transporting the instant machinery to H (hereinafter “H”) around October 2018, and the Defendant, upon receiving the request from H, decided to transport the instant machinery using two vehicles.

3) On October 29, 2018, the Defendant divided the instant machinery into four separate vehicles for the first vehicle (hereinafter “I”).

on the part of the track, the window, the window, and the J vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “J”).

4) The Defendant loaded level window and HPU on J vehicles at approximately 2 meters high from J vehicles, and raxurur and I.m. stoped on J vehicles.

arrow