The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged [2014 highest 7037] Defendant concluded a check contract with the branch of the Suwon Bank and the Defendant from August 31, 1989, under the name of the branch of the Suwon Bank and the Defendant, and traded the check number per unit.

On October 29, 201, the Defendant issued 33,00,000 won in the check number C, 40,000 won in the check amount, '40,000 won', '5 May 25, 2012' in the above bank name in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and issued 33,00,000 won in total as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table 9, and issued 33,00,000 won in the check number 9, such as in the list of crimes in attached Table 2. On May 2012, the Defendant corrected the issue date of check 'C' to 'C' in the Defendant's place of business located in Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, to 'C' on May 25, 2015, and corrected the issue date of the check number 9 as described in attached Table 1.

On November 14, 2014, each of the holders of the above check presented payment to the above bank during the period of time when payment was presented, but the Defendant was not paid as a disposition of suspension of transaction.

[2014 Highest 7159] The Defendant, from August 31, 1989, concluded a check contract with the original bank branch and the Defendant from August 31, 1989, and traded the check of shares.

On October 25, 2011 to October 29, 201, the Defendant issued to E four copies of the check of the above bank under the name of the Defendant, such as the table of crime (2) at a coffee shop between Jongno-gu Seoul, Seoul and the 5th day of the same month, where the neighboring trade name is unknown, and on August 2012, the “F” cosmetics of the Defendant’s operation in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jung-gu, Seoul. Under the agreement with the holder E of the check, the date of issuance of four copies of each of the above check as indicated in the list of crimes, respectively.

Each holder of the above check presented the check to the above bank within the payment period, but the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 2(2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act.