1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 28, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on November 2, 2015, on the ground that he was involved in an accident going beyond the scope of the AO’s early sports, and was discharged from military service on May 4, 2016 at a private hospital, on the left-hand knee-man’s kne-man’s kne-man’s kne-man’s kne-man’s kne-man’s kne-out.

B. On May 17, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State or the Defendant, and the Defendant has the same year.

9. 12. The Plaintiff rendered a decision that the instant wound does not meet the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State, but meets the requirements for veterans’ compensation.

C. After that, the Plaintiff received a new physical examination and reexamination for the determination of disability ratings. On May 26, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition to the Plaintiff that the instant disability falls short of the disability rating standards (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion as to whether the disposition is legitimate has occurred, despite the pertinent treatment for the instant wounds, the Plaintiff suffered unstableness due to damage to the public interest, and the degree of such instability is at least 10 meters.

Therefore, the instant wound falls under class 7 of disability rating 812, and the instant disposition that the instant wound falls short of the rating is unlawful as it is based on the determination of erroneous facts.

B. In the instant case, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff suffered unstableness due to damage to the public interest, and whether the degree of such instability exceeds 10 meters.

Rather, according to the result of the appraiser's physical entrustment, it is only recognized that the instability caused to the Plaintiff due to the instant injury was almost normal at least 1m.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion on the premise that the instability caused by damage to the public is more than 10 meters is without merit.

3. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.