1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff entered the Army on March 1, 2012 and discharged the Plaintiff from active service on September 16, 2014.

After that, on September 2012, the Plaintiff got injured by plicking and plicking down the right kne, kne, and applied for registration of a person eligible for veteran's compensation.

On March 10, 2015, the Defendant decided that the Plaintiff constitutes a person eligible for veteran's compensation by taking into consideration the “Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slives” as a personal figure.

On June 11, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision on whether the Plaintiff constitutes a person eligible for veteran's compensation on the ground that the Plaintiff does not meet the criteria for disability ratings (Grade I through VII) prescribed by statutes, following a physical examination of the above recognized status points.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, Gap’s evidence 1, Eul’s evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff fell under Paragraph 2 (819) or Grade 7 (8122) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion was unlawful since the Plaintiff’s allegation was a person who has a functional disorder in light of the latitude in two sections or one section of the three sections of one bridges (in spite of appropriate treatment, a person whose diameter is not less than 10 meters due to damage to the audience, or who, despite appropriate treatment, the change after the external change in the pelE-ray was clearly revealed in the examination of X-ray shooting, etc.) and falls under Paragraph 6(2) (819) or 7 (8122).

B. The judgment evidence Nos. 2-7 alone is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s failure to function in the border in two sections or one section of the three sections of the bridge between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff (in spite of appropriate treatment, a person whose diameter is not less than 10 meters, or who, despite appropriate treatment, changes after credit due to damage to x-ray, etc., clearly appeared in the inspection of x-ray shooting, etc.) is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Rather, according to the result of the court's entrustment of physical examination of the Seoul Hospital, the Plaintiff.