logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.25 2017고단3650
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) filed a report of C Apartment 706 dong 2001, the Defendant, the Defendant’s residence in 07:36 on May 28, 2017; (b) demanded that the instant apartment security guard sent a fake “bus to the police officer, a police officer affiliated with the police station affiliated with the said police station, to send a fake “bus as a mental hospital”; (c) sought to ask E of the same police station, who was dispatched to the said station together with D, about the details and damage of the Defendant’s report to the Defendant’s son; and (d) sought to ask us whether or not there was any defect in the situation where E, who was

During the Bara’s balphical balthal balthal balthal balthal balthal balthal balthal balthals of the police officer D, the said police officer’s balthal balthal balthalthal balths of D.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who is a police official, interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties concerning the protection of the lives, bodies, and property of the above D’s citizens, and the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of statements made in the course of making the warning to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The defendant interfered with judicial enforcement by obstructing a police officer in the course of lawful performance of official duties, and thus, is not good. favorable circumstances - the defendant recognizes all criminal facts. - The defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime. - The degree of damage inflicted by the victimized police officer should be taken into account in each of the above circumstances. The sentence as ordered in light of all the sentencing conditions revealed in the course of the public trial.

arrow