1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal of some content as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On December 12, 2017, the first instance court's judgment of the first instance court, "The above evidence, evidence Gap 9, and evidence Nos. 10" in Part 9 of Part 8 of Part 9 as "The above evidence, evidence No. 9, No. 10, and evidence No. 19" were as follows. The first instance court's judgment No. 9 through No. 15 of the first instance court's judgment is as follows. The defendant selected and notified the plaintiffs as regular-time companies subject to conversion on or around December 12, 2017. However, since the plaintiffs' duties at the time are determined to be "the duties to be employed as regular-time public officials," the plaintiffs are allowed to be employed through a separate recruitment procedure, and the above contents were notified together at the time of the above notification. On the other hand, some of the plaintiffs are currently public officials by supporting and passing a part-time public officials recruitment examination according to the defendant's guidance.

3. Thus, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.