A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

【2016 order 522】

1. Larceny;

A. On February 17, 2016: (a) around 04:00 to 08:00, the Defendant, at around 04:00 on February 17, 2016, set up one cell phone of 50 mobile phones owned by the victim H using the crepan in which the victim H was locked at around 08:00 on February 17, 2016, at G 200, G 2016, where the victim H was locked.

They go back.

Ultimately, the Defendant stolen the victim H’s property.

B. On February 20, 2016, around 07:30 to 10:00, the Defendant committed the crime, at around 07:30 on February 20, 2016, up to 07:10 on February 20, 2016, up to 10:00, G soup, such as the above A, the Defendant carried one f-phone when the victim I used the gap in which the victim I was divingd and 800,000 won in the head’s market price.

Ultimately, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim I.

(c)

around 05:00 to 10:10 on February 25, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime, at around 05:00 on February 25, 2016, around 05:10 around 05:0 on February 25, 2016 to 10:10 on July 25, 2016, the Defendant used a gap in the above paragraph (a) where the victim J is locked and carried 5,000,000 won of the market value of the victim’s ownership on the side.

Ultimately, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim J.

2. The Defendant, like the above paragraph 1, committed fraud by deceiving the purchaser of the stolen mobile phone as if it were a normal and high-phone, thereby raising an awareness of raising the arm’s length cost.

A. On February 17, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime around 14:00 on February 17, 2016, a lot located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-dong around 14:00 on February 17, 2016, before the department store, the Defendant: (a) reported and contacted the phone sales letters posted on the Internet NAV and posted on the website of the country; and (b) to the victim K, who reported and contacted the phone sales letters on the Internet NA, “A mobile phone is currently used, and is normally terminated.”

The victim K received 160,000 won from the victim K as the purchase price for the 5S mobile phone in the same place.

In fact, the above mobile phone was the mobile phone that the defendant stolen, such as the above paragraph 1(a).

In the end, the defendant K.