beta
Text
The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.
The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by taking into account the descriptions and images of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9, and the whole purport of the arguments as a result of the request for appraisal of medical records to the H Association of this Court:
Defendant F is a doctor who operates the Immuna (hereinafter referred to as the “instant hospital”) located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant G is a doctor who works in the instant hospital.
The deceased A (hereinafter referred to as the “the deceased”) is a patient who received the treatment at the instant hospital, and the Plaintiffs are the deceased’s bereaved family members and the deceased’s spouse, C, D, and E are the deceased’s children.
B. On November 24, 2015, the Deceased’s internal guards and 1) was examined by the J Hospital on November 24, 2015, and the Deceased was performed an operation to cut it by discovering 5 meters and 200 meters in the register. According to the results of the health examination issued by J Hospital, the Deceased stated that “Additional types of food may occur, and the Deceased’s internal border border is received.” 2) On June 1, 2016, the Deceased was admitted to the instant hospital due to symptoms, such as dials, etc., and Defendant G diagnosed the Deceased as “1do nuclear border” and prescribed a 7-day prescription on the grounds of the workplace and resistance examination, etc.
3) On November 21, 2016, the Deceased applied to the instant hospital due to symptoms, such as red dystrophe, etc., and Defendant F diagnosed the Deceased as “stroke and workplace blood, and other detailed changes in details,” based on the Sympical test, and prescribed a drug of seven days for the deceased. 4) On June 21, 2017, the Deceased applied to the instant hospital due to symptoms, such as continuous red dystrophe, and dypine dypine, etc., and Defendant G diagnosed the Deceased as “dypical and workplace blood, old dypine fypine, and one-day nuclear dypine,” and prescribed a drug of seven days.
C. The deceased’s team cancer diagnosis and death 1.