Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 6, 2015, in the vicinity of the Cheongcheon-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu Cheongcheon-gu, Incheon, the Defendant: (a) 112-reported that the Defendant used a taxi engineer without paying a taxi fee; (b) Does in the position of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong Police Station C District of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, which sent to the site after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant used the taxi engineer to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender on the suspicion of assault; (c) knenee that the Dobbbbbbs and Ys of the above D are walked five times due to the charge of assault; (d) Dobs and Dobs of the Dobs and the Dobs of the Dobs and the Dobs of the Dobs and Dobs of the E, knee, kn

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning D and E's 112 Report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, E, D, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (to select a fine in consideration of the fact that it is the primary offender, the fact that all of the errors are recognized and reflected, and the fact that a small amount of fine is deposited for police officers, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On May 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 15:40 on May 6, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) committed assault against the victim, such as: (c) on the 15:45 day on the day on which the Victim F (53 years of age) taxi was getting on and off from the Y5 taxi; and (d) on the 15:45 day on the same day, the Defendant was demanded by the victim to pay the taxi fee; (c) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was able to buck and knee with the victim’s buck and kne, walking the 7-time kne and kne, walking the kne and cutting the kne on

2. This part of the facts charged is an offender who cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express will under Article 260(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act.