1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants of the Plaintiff ordering payment shall be revoked.

The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows, and the part of “the decision” No. 4, No. 14, 14, and the part of “the decision No. 8, 17,” is the same as the ground for the judgment of the first instance, except for the deletion of the part of “the decision No. 17,” and thus, this is cited by the main text

Considering the overall purport of the arguments in light of the results of the appraisal of the medical record of the evidence No. 5-1, No. 5-2, and No. 6 of the first instance court, the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident was operated at a speed of about 15 km per hour, and the Plaintiff’s co-defendant’s left knee and back gate were shocked to the fronter of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the above A was placed in the emergency room immediately after the instant accident. The Defendant’s appeal was made at the time of the instant accident. However, according to the MRI’s results after the instant accident, the Defendant’s appeal was made to the lower court that there were no new symptoms of the first instance court, i.e., the Plaintiff’s symptoms of the first instance court, i., the first instance court, e., the first instance court, and the first instance court, and the first instance court, that there were no new symptoms of the first instance court, i.e., the Plaintiff’s symptoms and the first instance court.

However, the Defendant Hospital claimed KRW 10,936,750 to the Plaintiff, and only KRW 10,070,450 out of the above claim amount on March 9, 2010.