logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.07.25 2019구합50748
학교폭력 가해학생처분 무효확인등 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff B's lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. On December 17, 2018, the Defendant served the Plaintiff at the Han School.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The defendant is the principal of C Middle School established and operated by Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the "instant school"), and the plaintiff A was a person who attended the first year of the instant school in 2018, and the plaintiff B is the mother of the plaintiff A.

On December 7, 2018, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “the instant autonomous committee”) held a meeting around 15:30 on December 15, 2018, and resolved to take four hours of special education for guardians under Article 17(1)3 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “the Act on the Prevention of School Violence”) with respect to Plaintiff A at school under Article 17(1)3 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “the Act”).

Accordingly, on December 17, 2018, the Defendant rendered the same disposition with respect to Plaintiff A on the grounds of the following grounds (hereinafter “instant grounds for disciplinary action”) as the result of the instant autonomous committee’s resolution.

[3 days of service at school (3 hours) and 18 hours of special education at school (3 days) combined, “the Disposition No. 1 of this case,” and “the Disposition No. 2 of this case,” and “the Disposition No. 2 of this case,” which takes four hours of special education for guardians. · D did not explain the correct purpose when recording “E took part in the back of scars,” and recorded after only talking that the recording is anonymous, and this recording is recognized as having been sent to E who attended the meeting at the open seat on June 25, 2018 (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason No. 1 of this case”), and it was recognized that E took part in cleaning at the attendance of the meeting on June 1, 2018.”

arrow