1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants: (a) around June 2, 2016, at the 2nd head of the Dong-dong Dong-gu Dong-dong Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu,

Governance shall not fully have a governance.

“The body of the foregoing D to conduct a measurement of drinking and drinking,” and Defendant B towards the above police officers, “I do not scam the damaged vehicle,” and the scams are changed;

A bit of bit of bit of a bit of a vehicle shall be discarded.

“The chest of a slope D intended to threaten her to breath alcohol and to measure drinking was pushed down with both arms.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement protocol of D or E;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (a fine to Defendant A and a choice of imprisonment to Defendant B)

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A with a provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The sentencing guidelines for Defendant B [the scope of the recommended punishment] Class 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties) shall be the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (no person who is subject to special sentencing].

2. The crime obstructing the performance of official duties against police officers who properly perform official duties should be punished strictly, the defendant A does not have the same criminal record in the case of defendant A, and the defendant B had the criminal record of violence but again had the criminal record of violence in the case of this case.