A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on August 29, 2017, 404, “Cururher” located in Curura City B around 23:25 on August 29, 2017.

“Absent F of the Gyeonggi E Police Station, which was called upon the report of 112, and was called out, and was asked by G to explain the details of the call to the Defendant and to measure alcohol, “Absent F of the Gyeonggi E Police Station, which was called out,” and “Absented in the manner of his mind. I shall grow up in the manner to mislead the Defendant to the extent that this weather has to be caught.”

“In doing so, while interfering with a slope F’s photographing the situation at the time of the mobile phone as a dynamic image, he saw a slope F’s arms and knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne’s cell phone.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers who perform official duties, thereby hindering the legitimate execution of official duties.

2. On August 29, 2017, the Defendant was driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, taking into account the details of the report mentioned in paragraph (1) and 112 as well as the fact that the Defendant snicking, snicking, and snicking, sniffing the alcohol while under the influence of alcohol, in light of the following:46 on August 29, 201;

On August 30, 2017, 00:16, from that date, I refused to take a alcohol test without justifiable grounds, even though I demanded a alcohol test from that time to that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (for the main driver’s circumstantial report and accompanying video images);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of refusing to measure drinking);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade (inter-party to interference with the execution of official duties) are crimes.