1. The defendant,

A. The phrase “personal amount” in the attached Table 2 “the claim amount by plaintiff and the cited amount table” shall be indicated to the Plaintiff A.

1. Basic facts

A. Judicial Police Officers belonging to the Defendant (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Plaintiffs”), including the investigation process with respect to the Plaintiffs C, P, R, G, K, T, J, and B (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant Plaintiffs”), were forced to investigate the facts constituting the Defendant’s offense from September 19, 1981 to September 11, 1981, excluding Plaintiff C, Plaintiff C, Plaintiff P on July 6, 1981, Plaintiff A on August 1, 1981, Plaintiff B from the end of July 1, 1981 to the beginning of August 1, 1981, Plaintiff G on September 21, 1981, Plaintiff C, on September 11, 1981, Plaintiff K on September 11, 1981, Plaintiff T, and Plaintiff T, from September 11, 1981 to September 18, 1981, the Plaintiffs were forced to make an investigation into the Defendant’s violation of the National Security Act.

B. The judgment of conviction against the plaintiffs and the execution of sentence 1 plaintiff C, G, and S against each of the National Security Act violation, anti-public law violation, violation of martial law, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, violation of each National Security Act, violation of anti-public law, violation of martial law, violation of martial law, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, and violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, and the judgment of the court of first instance was indicted against the plaintiff Eul as a violation of anti-public law, violation of martial law, violation of martial law, violation of martial law, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, violation of part of the indictment against the plaintiff Eul among the facts charged on February 23, 1982, the court of first instance found the plaintiff Eul guilty of all of the remaining crimes, and found the plaintiff Eul guilty of all of the remaining crimes, violation of the National Assembly and Demonstration Act, violation of part of the assembly and Demonstration Act, violation of part of anti-public law against the plaintiff Eul.