A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 19, 2019, at around 22:15, the Defendant assaulted E’s chest in front of “C” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and reported 112 on the occurrence of a pedestrian traffic accident, and the police officer affiliated with the Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Police Station D police Station, who called the Defendant to stop and stop the people around and stop the Defendant, and boomed the Defendant, and assaulted E’s chest by the hand, who called “I would not have any person at the time when he did not have any person at the time,” and “I would not have any person at the time.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of traffic accident reports and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the place of occurrence and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not good, and the fact that the crime of this case is committed four times, etc. are committed against the defendant, while the defendant is committed against the defendant, the fact that the defendant is committed against the crime under the influence of alcohol, the fact that the crime is committed contingent, the degree of violence is not serious, and the last crime is committed in 2006, the circumstances favorable to the defendant are considered, and all other sentencing conditions in the records of this case are considered as favorable to the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition.