logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.01.13 2015고단3164
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, it is against Defendant B for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are co-principals.

On December 3, 2015, the Defendants reported that the Defendants are wraped with D and the body on the front side of the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu E-ro, Ulsan-gu, where the Defendants were wraped with D on December 3, 2015, and the police officers of the F District Police Station F District of Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, by receiving a report from G to the site and prevented them from leaving D. Defendant B from leaving the site. Defendant B “I fights in the fighting of Sknick.”

“A high sound, Defendant A took the bath of “Chos Ma, Ma,” and Defendant A took the bath of “Chos Ma,” with her hand, and boomed G with her hand at one time as her hand, and Defendant B tried to arrest Defendant A as a current offender who interfered with the performance of his official duties. Defendant B used “Chos dlebs” for G to the police officer who tried to arrest Defendant A as a current offender of interference with the performance of official duties.

“The body of G was boomed and was tightly pushed down.” The body of G was tightly pushed down.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and criminal investigation by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants who were selected to be sentenced to imprisonment: The choice of imprisonment (the number of criminal records before violence; Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to special larceny on November 201, 2013; Defendant A committed a second offense upon the expiration of the suspended period; degree of exercise of tangible power, etc.);

1. Defendant B of suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that no record exists that a person has been sentenced to suspension of qualification or heavier punishment for committing a crime by violence,

1. Defendant B of an order for community service or education: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow