beta
Text
1. The Defendants are KRW 370,722,013, and KRW 4,00,000 to Plaintiff A, respectively, and KRW 2,00,00,00 to Plaintiff C, D, E, and F.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 22, 2013, at around 09:29:29, Plaintiff A (G) was involved in a water-for-water accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) among water play in the Pyeongtaek-gun in the Pyeong-gun of Gyeonggi-gu, the Pyeong-gu, the Pyeong-gu, the Pyeong-gu, the Pyeong-gu, the Pyeong-gu, the Pyeong-gu, the Pyeongcheon-gu, the fact inquiry report by the Pyeong chief of the fire department was also indicated as “chillcheon-do.” However, this appears to be a clerical error, and the relevant accident is in the state of unknown consciousness and sacity that may be caused by the damage to the sa
Plaintiff
B is the mother of the plaintiff A, and the plaintiff C, D, E, and F are the arbs of the plaintiff A.
B. The instant river is a local river with an extended total of about 39 km that flows into North Korea from the Cheong-gyeong-gu in the same Cheong-gyeong-gu in the case of the Gyeonggi-gu.
[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, Eul 2, and Eul 2, the results of the physical appraisal commission to the chief of the Central University Hospital of this court, the results of fact inquiry to the chief of the Eunpyeong District Office, the purport of the entire pleadings
2. Determination as to the occurrence of liability for damages
A. Pursuant to Article 8(2) of the River Act, the Defendant Gyeonggi-do (the Do Governor and the Do Governor are the Defendant Gyeonggi-do, the local government to which they belong; hereinafter the same shall apply) having jurisdiction over the location of the river of this case shall manage the river of this case without distinguishing the two.
However, pursuant to Article 9(2) and attached Table 2 of the Local Autonomy Act and the Gyeonggi-do Ordinance on the Delegation of Administrative Affairs, the defendant Gyeonggi-do delegated the affairs concerning the maintenance and repair of the river of this case and the inspection of the status of river management to the head of Pyeongtaek-do, and the defendant Pyeongtaek-gun, a local government to which the head of Pyeongtaek-do belongs, has disbursed expenses, such
Therefore, if it is recognized that there is any defect in the management of the river of this case, which is a natural structure, the defendant Gyeonggi-do as a manager.