Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 1, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than three years and not more than ten years, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 31, 2013, and on May 6, 2016, the Defendant was subject to attachment of an electronic tracking device from the same date to May 5, 2026.

[Criminal facts]

1. Where the Defendant was sentenced to a judgment ordering the attachment of an electronic tracking device at the time of the pronouncement of the judgment, the Defendant was subject to the duty of compliance, etc., such as “from 00:00 to 06:00 each day, to take out outside the Defendant’s dwelling place outside the Defendant’s dwelling place.” Thus, the Defendant shall not be subject to any violation without justifiable grounds.

Nevertheless, on July 24, 2016, the Defendant did not return home to Ctel 601, which is the Defendant’s residence in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, from August 8, 2016 to August 22, 2016, and did not return home to the Defendant’s residence until August 13, 2016, which is the extended time limit of departure due to his/her occupation from August 8, 2016 to August 22, 2016, but did not return home to the Defendant’s residence until August 13, 202:09, and on August 18, 2016, the Defendant violated his/her duty to comply by failing to return home to the Defendant’s residence by not later than 02:05 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the rules of the electronic tracking device on three occasions without justifiable reasons.

2. On August 22, 2016, the Defendant was given a warning in writing that the Defendant was urged to perform the matters to be observed by the head of the Seoul Protection Office and was subject to disadvantageous disposition, such as execution of punishment, at the Defendant’s residence, as described in paragraph (1) around August 22, 2016, in violation of the above matters to be observed.

Nevertheless, the defendant.