A fine shall be imposed on the crimes of 1-b, c and 2 in the judgment of the defendant in 1-b, c and 1-6.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On December 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to three years to imprisonment for the attempted quasi-rape, etc. at the Daejeon High Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on December 1, 2014. On April 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties at the wooden District Court Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 9, 2015. On October 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to three months for a violation of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Offenders and the Electronic Monitoring, Etc. at the Gwangju District Court Branch Branch Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 3, 2015.

[2] On June 14, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to an order to attach a location tracking device at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court for the attachment of an electronic device, and the Defendant imposed a duty to comply with the attachment of an electronic device, including “to take out the device outside the residence from 24:00 to 06:00 each day during the period of attachment of the electronic device,” and installed the location tracking device from the completion date of the execution of each of the above punishment.

1. Violation of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders, Electronic Monitoring, etc.;

A. The Defendant, in violation of the rules of prohibition from going out at night, was prohibited from going out of his/her residence from 24:00 to 06:00 during the period of attachment of an electronic device, and was unable to return to his/her residence before 24:00, without obtaining prior permission from the protection observation officer, despite the fact that he/she obtained prior permission from the protection observation officer, from November 7, 2015 to December 3, 2015, the Defendant did not return to his/her residence at least seven times in total without obtaining prior permission from the protection observation officer, such as the list Nos. 1 to 7.00.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the code of conduct to prohibit outing at night without any justifiable reason.

B. After the warning of the warden of the observation for protection, the Defendant violated the rules of practice does not repent of the past mistakes in the name of the warden of the observation center for Gwangju Protection, in violation of the matters to be observed by those subject to observation for protection without justifiable grounds, as set forth in Nos. 1 through 7, 2015, as of December 3, 2015.