A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of a sentence shall be deferred for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving) and the Road Traffic Act shall drive a vehicle frequently or frequently.

On August 26, 2017, the Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.153% in blood transfusion 0.9:21, and driven the road of three-lanes in front of the E-distance D located in the south-gu, Southern-gu, Yanananan-si, the Defendant driven the two-lanes in the direction of the terminal in the direction of the Yananananan-gu, in the speed of about 60km.

At all times, since the signal, etc. is installed, the driver has a duty of care to drive in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform such duty of care due to influence of drinking and neglected to drive a car in a state of difficulty, and by negligence in violation of the stop signal of the Defendant’s driver’s driver’s driver’s driver’s license, carried out in accordance with the new subparagraph from the right side of the vehicle driving direction of the Defendant’s driver’s driver’s license to the left side of the passenger’s driver’s license.

In this accident, victims F and victims H (persons South, 63 years old, K5 passengers) suffered injuries, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of two weeks medical treatment, respectively, and the victim F-owned K5 automobiles were departments to account for approximately KRW 2,796,924 for repair costs, such as the exchange of the front driver.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven a cM525 V car at approximately 3km section 3km to the roads front of the E-distance located in the south-gu, Southern-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.153% in the light of the day specified in paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of CM525 V car.

At the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, the Defendant operated the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance at a section of about 3 km.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement (F, H).