logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.09.10 2014고단3088
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. At around 14:30 on July 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took a bath at the Defendant’s house located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) was ordered by the competent authority to restore the stable constructed without permission to its original state; and (c) was inflicted on the victim B (50 years of age) with two hand floors; and (d) was inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the son’s dynae, dynae, dump, tension, etc. in the part of the wood that requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

B. The defendant is in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.)

The date and time, at the place, as described in Paragraph 2, the victim B threatened the victim with a knife, one knife, which is a dangerous object at the place, on the ground that the victim B wishes to go to G, one of his wife, and thereby, the victim threatened the victim.

2. Defendant B, at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1), expressed the victim’s desire to “for the same year, year, year, and year without a container,” and publicly insultd the victim on the ground that the victim’s G (n, age 46) takes into account the issues of restitution to the stable and container sales cost.”

Summary of Evidence

As to Paragraph 1 (Defendant A part)

1. Each legal statement of witness B and H;

1. A certificate of injury, or a report on medical records (B);

1. A written statement (B);

1. The recording recording (Evidence List 34) first argues that the statement of B and H is not reliable because the statement of B and H is inconsistent or contradictory with the contents of the statement, while there is only a fact that he saw the b's b's b's b's b's b's b's b's b'.

In other words, B made a statement about the part facing the Defendant and made a false statement from the Defendant. However, the content of “the Defendant” first flabed B’s neck back or flabed B’s flab, and then flabed B’s flab.

‘A’ and the statements of H, which have been observed, are also minor.

arrow