1. Approval of the implementation plan for the development project of the new distribution complex publicly notified by the Defendant on July 5, 2013 is 2. Other matters.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 30, 2003, the Minister of Finance and Economy published a development plan to designate a free economic zone in the Mayang Mann-do and a development plan for a new complex in the Mayang-do. On October 30, 2003, the Minister of Finance and Economy approved an implementation plan to designate a free economic zone in the Mayangyang-do, and distributed a new complex to take charge of education, residence, and leisure functions of a free economic zone in the Mayangyang-do, and announced a development plan to take charge of foreigners' schools, hospitals, golf courses, residential functions, etc. on November 3, 2006.

On August 30, 2007, the project implementer was the Plaintiff, and the project implementer was changed to the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Supplementary Intervenor”).

B. On June 4, 2013, the Defendant requested consultation with the Plaintiff on the approval of the implementation plan for the new complex development project, and sent to the Plaintiff an official letter stating that “In relation to the application for the approval of the modification of the implementation plan for the new complex development project for the new complex development project, the applicant sent a reply to the Plaintiff by June 14, 2013, as was added under Articles 9 and 11 of the Special Act on Designation and Management of Free Economic Zones with respect to the application for the approval of the modification of the implementation plan for the new complex development project for the new complex development project for the new complex in the Gwangju Yang Man-do Free Economic Zone (hereinafter “instant official letter”).

The official text of this case was attached with the attached document in which “a copy of the application for modification of the implementation plan for the new complex development project” (hereinafter “instant application”) was stated, but actually not accompanied by the official text of this case.

C. On June 13, 2013, the Plaintiff’s response sought an opinion from the relevant department on the amendment of the above implementation plan.