The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant was given to the disabled in the second degree of mental retardation, and was in depth recognized the crime of this case and was divided into depth, and the night building intrusion theft crime was committed in an attempted crime.

However, the defendant has a record of being subject to criminal punishment several times for the same crime, and in particular, during the period of repeated crime of the same crime, the crime of this case is committed, and there is no responsibility for such crime, and no recovery of damage has yet been made from the larceny crime.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.