The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The amount of defraudation by the instant crime is not so significant, and the damage was recovered from the crime. The circumstances and the equity with the case where the judgment was rendered at the same time as the final judgment became final and conclusive for a considerable period of time was already reflected in the sentencing of the lower court.

In addition, the defendant has more than 10 years of the punishment of imprisonment and fine for the same kind of crime, such as inhumanisticities, and in particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case with the intention to commit the crime of integrative erosion and obstruction of business twice during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered newly after the sentence of the judgment of the court below.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.