A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol from C belonging to the police station in front of the 952 Scattering Dong-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong on September 14, 2015; and (b) was under the influence of alcohol, and (c) was under the influence of alcohol;

The rings expressed the desire to me, carried the said C’s timber and chest in his hand, sealed the said D’s timber and the upper part of the instant D’s left clothes once due to the lush.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence is determined as per the disposition, taking into account the following: (a) there is no basic area (from June to April 1) (the person in charge of special sentencing) (the decision of sentencing) (the person in charge of special sentencing) (the decision of sentencing is two police officers; (b) there is no criminal record of the same kind, there is no criminal record of the suspended sentence; (c) there is no criminal record of the same kind, there is no criminal record of the suspended sentence; and (d) there is no criminal record of the suspended sentence; and (e) there