Presumption history of the family register at the time of the discovery of evidence against the registered facts of the family register;

The registration of a family register may be denied on the basis of the opposite evidence.

[Judgment of the court below]

Defendant (Attorney Park Jin-young, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Seoul High Court Decision 4294No568 delivered on July 21, 1961

the original judgment shall be reversed.

The case is remanded to Seoul High Court.

The ground of appeal No. 1 by the defendant's attorney is examined.

According to the court below's evidence No. 1 without dispute, it can be recognized that the deceased non-party 1 reported to the deceased non-party 2 who is the father of the plaintiff's husband as his father on January 8, 1959 and registered on the plaintiff's family register. Thus, it can be acknowledged that the non-party 1 was the father of the plaintiff's husband and that the non-party 1 could not reverse the plaintiff's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's father's non-party 1's father's father's father's father's non-party relation. However, even if the plaintiff's non-party 1 did not respond to the plaintiff's non-party 1's husband's non-party's non-party's non-party's non-party's non-party's family register's non-party 1's husband's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's husband's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's husband.

Supreme Court Judge Lee Young-chul(Presiding Judge) (Presiding Justice)