Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 22, 2014, the Defendant would pay the price to D, who is an employee of the victim C, who is a trading company, in the falloned land, by posting a telephone, and installing the marketing of the Seoul Jongno-gu Egallon building, Jongno-gu Egallon building.

A false statement was made.

However, at the time, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price in time, even if he was performing the construction by trading from the injured party by failing to receive the claim for the construction cost in time and reaching 70 million won of delinquent taxes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with crowdfunding construction works worth KRW 6.4 million.

2. On December 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) called the phone call to D, who is an employee of the victim C, on December 19, 2014; (b) sent 1,300,000 won out of the construction cost of KRW 2,30,000,000, and (c) changed the construction work to the Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government cafeteria cafeteria cafeteria, and

A false statement was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price in time even if he was to perform the crowdfunding work from the injured party, such as the above 1.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was provided with 1,00,000 won of the construction cost from the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (two times);

1. Each quotation, trading service instruction, investigation report (Attachment of suspect's tax arrears details) [Attachment of the above] statute applies to G's investigation agency's consistently statement from G's investigation agency to this Court, on April 22, 2014, that construction is not ordered separately by receiving an estimate based on the details included in agency's deposit. However, according to the consistent statement from G's investigation agency to this court, it can be acknowledged that the Defendant separately issued an order after receiving a estimate from the injured party];

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, respectively;