A fine of 10,000 is imposed on the Defendant’s [2015 senior group 3190] fraud and [2015 senior group 3633] No. 4 of [2015 senior group 363] fraud.

Punishment of the crime

On May 7, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the District Court of Jung-gu on May 7, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 11, 2014.

On December 12, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract for a construction project with the victim C and Changho-ho, which intends to pay a shower in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul to KRW 4.5 million for construction work.

However, even if the Defendant received the payment of the construction cost as above, he did not have the intent or ability to execute the construction work in accordance with the agreement as a plan for personal use of the remaining money, using the shower general equivalent to KRW 1.5 million.

As above, the Defendant deceivings the victim, namely, from the victim, i.e., 2.5 million won from the seat on December 17, 2014, and 1 million won on December 19, 2014, but did not perform the agreed construction work even after receiving the remittance of KRW 1 million around December 19, 2014, thereby deceiving 4.5 million in total.

On May 7, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Jung-gu District Court on May 7, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 15, 2014, and the execution of the said punishment was completed on August 11, 2014.

1. On January 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) transferred KRW 1,200,000 to an account in the name of E in the name of E in order to require agreement, from 10,000 to 1,20,000 to 1,20,000 won in the account in the name of E in order to pay the victim with the installment savings with the maturity of January 30, 2014.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay money on the date of promise even if he borrowed money from the damaged person due to the absence of installment savings paid by the defendant.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1,200,000 from the damaged party to the post office account in the name of E.

2. On February 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the place of Paragraph (1) on February 17, 2014; and (b) at the above victim’s place, the Defendant borrowed money to the Defendant and kept in custody, and (c) the Defendant would immediately pay the installment savings.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, the defendant was found to be guilty.