1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a representative director of D, a corporation established for the purpose of electrical construction business, etc. in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C 402.

In order to satisfy the number of electrical construction engineers necessary for maintaining the registration of D’s electrical construction business, the Defendant borrowed the above E’s electrical construction engineer’s career pocketbook (issuance Number F) from around December 14, 2009 to May 26, 2010, and used the above E’s career pocketbook by registering it as an electrical construction engineer belonging to D from that time to May 26, 2010.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's defendant's statement in court (it was the defendant's incorporation of the corporation D around 2000, which did not conduct electrical construction business before 2009, required electrical construction technicians, etc. to give orders for electrical construction work at the EL branch in the old-U.S. in 2009, delegated all of the business affairs related to orders to the construction work to the director of the former-U.S. site and processed all of the business affairs related to the construction work at the time, and did not know who was actually engaged in the construction work at the time. The defendant and his defense counsel had already been registered with three technicians necessary for the maintenance of registration of electrical construction business at the time, so they did not require E's license, and the defendant did not participate in the registration of E.

However, even if the defendant's statement is based on the defendant's statement, four electrical engineers including E, including E, through the subcontractor company, are listed on December 14, 2009 for the order of electrical construction in the old EL branch, and E's specific name, etc. has been omitted.

Even if the defendant was at the time, it is judged that there was an incomplete intention about the lending of the engineer's career pocketbook to the defendant, so the corresponding part of the claim is reasonable.