logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.10.18 2014고단261
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendants are those engaged in driving of vehicles in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act;

On July 21, 2011, at around 21:45, the Defendant: (a) while driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.109% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.109%; (b) while driving the front distance in front of the E in front of the vehicle D at the right-hand to the right-hand left-hand in the port of the registry at the peace-dong room, the Defendant received the front part of the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle in front of the left-hand part of the Victim F (the age of 45) driver’s Gone Star or the left-hand part of the vehicle, who violated the signal under the influence

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, sustained bodily injury, such as fluoral salt, etc., which requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time did not take necessary measures, such as aiding the victim, even though the damaged vehicle was damaged to have approximately KRW 4,266,856 of the repair cost.

2. On July 21, 201, the Defendant was driving a Cgp motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol of about 0.109% without a driver’s license for a vehicle in the direction of approximately 6km from the inn of the inn of the inn part before the inn part of the Cgp motor vehicle at the direction of about 6km to the inn part of the Egp-distance road located in the Egpular road in the same city.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, has driven C-pon vehicles that were not covered by mandatory insurance, such as the preceding paragraph.

Accordingly, the defendant operated a vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

arrow