A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 9, 2012, the Defendant, who violated the Act, committed fraud and the Attorney-at-Law, with the knowledge that the victim C was unable to recover 170 million won for a long period of time against D’s credit, he was aware that he was well aware of the court, prosecutor’s office, and the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, with the intent to acquire money under the pretext of obtaining a claim collection through the debtor’s property investigation, civil and criminal litigation, etc.

On April 9, 2012, the Defendant received money from the victim C to the F cafeteria located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu by identifying information such as the debtor’s address, property, financial account, etc. by identifying the debtor’s address, financial account, etc., and requesting the Financial Supervisory Service employees to inquire into the debtor’s bank balance and property, and requesting it to request it. As such, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the expenses necessary for the above request would be changed to three million won.

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to use it as a solicitation to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 1.5 million won in the deposit account (Account Number H) in the name of G community credit cooperatives designated by the Defendant on the same day from the victim as above, as the activity expenses related to solicitation to employees of the Financial Supervisory Service on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of inducing or arranging the case or affairs handled by an employee who is deemed a public official at the same time by deceiving the victim.

2. On April 20, 2012, the Defendant who violated the Attorney-at-Law Act by fraud and the Attorney-at-Law Act committed by the Defendant on April 20, 2012, with the knowledge that the Defendant was making efforts to receive the above one billion won return from I, by filing a criminal complaint against the said I, after the Victim C suffered a fraudulent damage of one billion won from C