The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment by the Gwangju District Court for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 27, 2014.

1. Around October 2010, the Defendant violated the Attorney-at-Law Act: (a) requested the head of Gyeyang-gun to the head of the related Si/Gun so that he could be promoted to Grade F public officials of Grade F public officials of Grade F of the Mayang-gun Office, which was known to the general public officials of Grade F of the Mayang-gun Office; (b) requested the head of the related Si/Gun to change KRW 20 million; and (c) around November 1, 2010, received money and valuables from the H parking lot in which he received KRW 20 million in cash from E on the pretext of solicitation for the head of the related Mayang-gun, which was managed by the public officials.

2. On December 2010, the Defendant, who violated the Attorney-at-Law Act, heard that I would be employed as a police officer assigned for special guard in the Republic of Korea through the friendship group called J, K, and K K, who is a public official assigned for the water supply and drainage service at the Hayang-gun Office of Water and Wastewater Works, by call to I, I would be employed as a police officer assigned for special guard in the above H office, and I would request I to be employed as a police officer assigned for special guard at the request of I, and thereafter, I would be employed as a police officer assigned for special guard through the above K and L. At that time, I would be employed as a police officer assigned for special guard through the above K and L. On December 6, 2010, the Defendant requested I to request the money of KRW 10 million,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000 won, and received and handled cash affairs from the above H office under the name of a public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement statement of each prosecutor's office to E, I, L, and K;

1. Relevant provisions of the Acts concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 111 (1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act chosen to impose a sentence;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: