1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 25, 2010, the Mayor of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government formulated a “C Master Plan” (hereinafter “instant Master Plan”) that designates the size of 136,000 square meters for B Japan in Seocho-gu Seoul as a zone for the maintenance of detached housing (hereinafter “instant Master Plan”) and publicly announced it as D public notification on November 25, 2010.

B. On February 17, 2015, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor amended the instant master plan to exclude some excellent buildings (business facilities and neighborhood living facilities) and reduce the project area, etc., and designated the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Japan-129,850 square meters as a housing reconstruction improvement zone (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”) as a housing reconstruction improvement zone, and publicly announced the improvement plan and topographic drawings, etc. as E, and publicly announced as such.

On March 19, 2015, the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City amended the improvement plan and publicly announced that two new sites were added to a new lawsuit omitted from the original urban planning facility decision (revision) report to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City public noticeF.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition for designation” (hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition for designation”).

The Defendant is the head of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “head of Seocho-gu”) for the purpose of implementing the housing reconstruction improvement project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant improvement project”) in the instant improvement zone, and the Housing Reconstruction and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “instant association establishment authorization”) which obtained authorization on July 29, 2016 from the head of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “head of Seocho-gu”) and the project implementation authorization on September 7, 2017. The Plaintiffs were the sectional owners of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Building (hereinafter referred to as the “instant officetel”), who agreed to the

On September 3, 2018, the Defendant obtained authorization from the head of Seocho-gu on the management and disposition plan (hereinafter “instant management and disposition plan”). The instant management and disposition plan is classified as the Plaintiffs as the subject of cash settlement.

E. Land and buildings within the instant improvement zone.