Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for four years and four years at the Changwon District Court for the charge of forging private documents, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 22, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. In order to raise the limit of his/her identification card, B forged private documents shall transfer his/her identification card, etc. to the Defendant. On May 14, 2013, the Defendant, using a computer at any place in Gwangju-si, sealed the Defendant’s name “C”, “B” in his/her position column, “B” in his/her name column, “B” in his/her date of birth, “D.” on January 4, 2012 to May 14, 2013. “A” proves that his/her employee is currently in office at present.” On May 14, 2013, the Defendant affixed his/her seal of F in advance attached his/her name column of his/her employment certificate “C”, “C” in his/her position column, “B.” on the date of birth” from January 4 to May 14, 2012.

In addition, the Defendant stated in the same manner that “A corporate name (trade name) C, ② the representative F, 20,576,460’s total sum of the wage 20,576,460’s, “2,376,000”, “an accounting 22,952,460”, “28 February 28, 2013,” and “F” as “A person obligated to collect tax withholding receipts for wage and salary income,” and affixed a F’s seal on the name column of F for tax withholding receipts for wage and salary income.

Accordingly, the defendant and B conspired each forged the F's employment certificate, which is a private document in F's name on certification of fact, and the receipt for tax withholding for wage and salary income.

2. The Defendant and B conspired to send the forged employment certificate and the receipt for tax withholding for wage and salary income at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) to the employees in charge of credit cards, whose name is unknown, in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and who sent it by facsimile, as if they were duly formed.

3. The fraud B calls to an employee in charge of credit cards whose name the victim’s cards company cannot be identified at any place around the date specified in paragraph (1).