Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving C Freight Vehicles.

On May 8, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on May 18, 2014, and was proceeding in the vicinity of the crosswalk in which no front signal, etc. is available at the front of the space apartment at the front of the front in the front of the front.

In this case, if a pedestrian passes a crosswalk, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to stop temporarily in front of the crosswalk so as not to obstruct or endanger the crossing of the pedestrian.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the victim D (06-years) who was crossing the crosswalk in the spatial apartment side by negligence, which led to the shock of the above vehicle as part of the driver's seat.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, which requires approximately 8 weeks stability, or other injuries to the body of his body in light of the body of his body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and a photograph of the accident site;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of diagnosis certificates;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The instant accident occurred due to the Defendant’s failure to perform his/her duty of care, such as passing along a crosswalk, while passing the crosswalk under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the injury suffered by the victim is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant. The victim’s negligence is partly caused in the instant accident, the vehicle operated by the Defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance contract, and the fact that the victim agreed with the insurance company is favorable to the Defendant.

The above circumstances are as follows.