logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.02.11 2013고합415
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of five years and a fine of one hundred and fifty thousand won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[criminal power] On December 24, 2002, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on January 6, 2005, sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on April 22, 2010, and completed the execution of the sentence on February 6, 2013, after being sentenced to two months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Jung-gu District Court on April 23, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

[2013Gohap415]

1. From August 10, 2013, the Defendant habitually committed a violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief). From August 10, 2013 to September 1, 2013, the Defendant stolen or stolen money and valuables worth KRW 11,00,000, the market price of which is the victim’s possession, 11,000, which is the victim’s currency gift certificates, from July 11, 201 to September 1, 2013, by 13 times in the list of crimes (i), by cutting off money and valuables worth KRW 44,721,30,00 in total market price or by stealing goods from “E” restaurant of the victim D’s operation, and then did not have attempted to do so.

2. On July 13, 2013, the Defendant in violation of the Fraud and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act purchased gold Bans from the “G” bank of the victim’s name in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, which was located in F on July 13, 2013, and acquired a theft of KRW 1,570,300 by using credit cards more than five times in total, as indicated in the attached Table (2) from July 13, 2013 to July 17, 2013, by suggesting that the modern card in the name of H, which was stolen, as stated in the above 1.30,000, was presented as if the Defendant’s credit card was the Defendant’s credit card.

3...

arrow