logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.07.21 2015고단2713
사기
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A statement of economic profits equivalent to the Plaintiff’s royalty to solve problems of early withdrawal;

A. On October 29, 2013, the Defendant, via the e-mail framework, expressed 3,000 won per one issue, if the Defendant provided the victim C with the e-mail explanation of the English problem of the hydro-occine English language to the victim C through the e-mail mold at the office of the Co., Ltd. (E) located in the third floor of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building (hereinafter “E”).

was made.

However, at that time, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay explanatory money to the victim even if the Plaintiff was prepared from the injured party, because the Defendant had been economically difficult to pay E employee benefits.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) caused the victim to do so, and (c) caused the victim to do so, to do so, a total of 846 stories from around that time to November 9, 2013; and (d) did not pay the Plaintiff fee of KRW 2.5 million, but did not acquire the same pecuniary profit.

B. The Defendant, F, G, and H, via e-mail at the above E office around October 2013, would offer 3,000 won per one issue to the victim I, the victim G, and the victim H as the Plaintiff’s fee by providing the victim I, the victim G, and the victim H with the explanation of the harm from high school veterinary science.

was made.

However, there was no intention or ability of the victims to pay explanatory fees, even if the plaintiffs were prepared by the victims, since the defendant had been economically difficult to pay E employee benefits.

The defendant deceivings the victims as above, and around that time, the victim F was 4.50 million won in total, which is equivalent to 1.350,000 won for the plaintiff's fee. The victim G was 1.329,000 won in total, and the victim H was 6.60,000 won in total and did not receive the plaintiff's fee, but did not have the victim H paid a total of 3.39,000 won in property interest.

2. The acquisition of promissory notes with face value of 25 million won or more;

arrow