1. The lawsuit against the plaintiff shall be dismissed by the President of the Culture and Arts Academy of Korea;

2. Defendant 1’s first instance trial case’s c.o.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is the chief executive officer of the KCA and KCA and KCA and the chief executive officer of the consolidated religious order.

Plaintiff

The Korea Veterans Association ANo. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff's Union") is a labor association under the jurisdiction of the defendant, and the Korea Veterans Association Ch class (hereinafter referred to as the "C class group") is a branch church belonging to the Plaintiff's Union.

B. The first and second hearing approval resolution against Plaintiff B and the second hearing approval resolution against Plaintiff B and the second general assembly ruling dismissing the claim for confirmation of invalidity of the above resolution (hereinafter referred to as “the judgment of a general assembly”) are indicated as “the decision of a general assembly or “the decision of a general assembly”. The final judgment or decision in the Defendant trial court is indicated as “the decision of a general assembly” (hereinafter referred to as “the first hearing resolution”) and the third party council resolution on August 29, 2010 and the second party council resolution on September 26, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as “the first hearing resolution”).

(3) On October 24, 201, the Plaintiff Union’s resolution to approve the above ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice Appellant (hereinafter “First ice ice ice

2) On August 12, 2013, the Defendant trial court filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the first approval of the ice ice Viewing resolution with the Defendant trial division against the Plaintiff’s president of the Plaintiff’s Union by asserting that the Plaintiff’s work experience was falsely recorded and that the approval of the ice ice was null and void. The Defendant trial division filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the first approval of the ice ice Viewing resolution with the Defendant trial division against the Defendant’s president. On August 12, 2013, the Defendant trial division rendered a general assembly judgment (e.g., the case G of the Plaintiff’s general trial division; hereinafter

(2) On March 31, 2014, the court rendered a ruling of a general meeting that revises the type of the above litigation as “litigation seeking confirmation of invalidity, etc.” from the “litigation seeking confirmation of invalidity of a resolution,” and Paragraph (2) of the main text thereof as “the first hearing approval resolution is confirmed to be null and void” in Article 79 of the 79 regular union of labor union ( October 24, 201) to the effect that the decision that approved the Plaintiff B’s ice as the delegate pastor of the C Curriculum is null and void (hereinafter “instant general meeting correction decision”).

AB made it.

Then, the defendant.