1. All lawsuits filed by the Plaintiff B against the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff A-.

1. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. The Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties are those working in the inspection office of the State Council, and the Plaintiff reported the irregularities against the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties, and disclosed the overlapped contents to D, and the Plaintiff inspected and investigated the Plaintiff A from June 25, 2015 to June 26, 2015 in order to pressure Plaintiff A according to D’s instructions, and committed the following illegal acts in the process:

① Although there was no error against the Plaintiff A, a retaliation investigation was conducted against the Plaintiff (no petition, etc. against the Plaintiff A).

(2) The Air Force Commander sent the body in an voluntary operation form without the order of investigation by the Air Force Commander.

③ Despite the existence of a fact of assistance in the Office of Audit and Inspection, an investigation was conducted in the investigation into the fact of assistance in the location of the police station.

④ The Plaintiff’s motion to conduct a siren-type investigation on the Plaintiff’s mobile phone was strong, and the Plaintiff’s motion to conduct a siren-type investigation up to the time of false verbal detection.

B. The above illegal acts committed by the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties, and the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties are obliged to pay the Plaintiff a solatium of KRW 100 million.

C. However, while transferring KRW 10,00 of the claim for consolation money against the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the Appointor of the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is obligated to notify the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the Appointor of the assignment of the claim, and to pay KRW 35,00,000 as part of consolation money to the Plaintiff, and KRW 10,000,000 as transfer money to the Plaintiff, and KRW 10,000 and damages for delay to the Plaintiff.

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiffs asserted that the withdrawal of the lawsuit against the Defendant (Appointed Party) was terminated by the lawsuit against the Defendant (Appointed Party) and that the lawsuit against the Defendant (Appointed Party) was terminated by the lawsuit against the Defendant (Appointed Party). As such, the Plaintiffs were examined and the Defendant (Appointed Party) on December 23, 2015.