1. On May 30, 2006, Incheon District Court Decision 2006Gadan2721 decided May 30, 2006 against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties.

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. Some of the grounds for rejection (Appointed) and the designated parties have filed a non-conditional refusal of compulsory execution based on the judgment as stipulated in Paragraph (1) of this Article, but they have filed a motion for refusal of compulsory execution on the ground that they had received a judgment of limited acceptance by inheritance due to the cause of claim. The qualified acceptance is approved on the condition that they will repay the debts of the inheritee within the scope of the property to be acquired by inheritance. As such, the part of the motion for refusal of compulsory execution on the part exceeding the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C among the claims by the plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties is cited, and the remainder of claims