logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.04.28 2019나209902
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The first floor C is one of the rental housing again leased to a person eligible for support for housing stability, such as recipients of basic living assistances selected by the competent local government in accordance with the “existing Housing Lease Project” (hereinafter “the instant housing”), from among the rental housing again leased to a person eligible for support (hereinafter “the instant housing”).

B. On November 17, 2014, the DD Corporation provided that the instant housing was leased from Nonparty E and F to the Plaintiff, a beneficiary of basic living, for two years from KRW 75,000,000, and the Plaintiff was residing in the instant housing from December 8, 2014. Under the monthly rent agreement concluded with the owner of the instant housing, the Plaintiff paid KRW 150,000 per month in addition to paying KRW 3,750,000 out of the deposit for the deposit.

C. On October 31, 2016, the D Corporation agreed to pay KRW 132,250 per month in rent, in addition to paying KRW 4,250,000 out of the deposit to the owners of the instant housing as tenant charges, while maintaining a lease relationship with respect to the instant house in the form of a re-contract. On October 2, 2018, the amount that the Plaintiff paid as tenant charges out of the deposit was increased to KRW 4,950,00,000 in addition to paying KRW 4,250 out of the deposit as tenant charges.

On the other hand, from July 2015, the government restructuring the basic livelihood security policy with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport housing welfare policy as the competent department, and began to implement a policy that pays a certain amount of housing benefits through a housing survey to the households whose income amount is not more than 43% of the standard median income. As a basic livelihood recipient, the Plaintiff is aware of the implementation of the said policy on October 2018 and the head of Seoyang-si, Goyang-si, one having jurisdiction over the instant housing lease relationship.

arrow