The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The defendant's defense counsel's assertion of misunderstanding of facts that "the crime against the victim F is not consistent with memory" stated in the statement of grounds of appeal shall be considered as a "fact-finding" argument, and such argument shall be judged accordingly.

The crime against the victim F is denied because it is not well memory.

The Defendant asserted mental disorder was in a state of mental disorder by drinking at the time of each of the instant crimes.

The punishment sentenced by the court below on the argument of unfair sentencing (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심 법원이 채택조사한 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피해자 F의 일관되고 분명한 진술(사건 당시 범인의 얼굴을 정확하게 목격하였고, 수사기관에서 제시한 8명의 남성 사진 중 피고인의 사진을 보고 범인임을 확신하였다는 취지), ② 피해자가 수사 과정 및 원심 법정에서 진술한 범인의 인상착의(스포츠형 머리모양에 동그란 얼굴, 키는 160cm 대 정도, 머리카락이 거의 하얗게 되었다는 점 등)와 피고인의 인상착의가 상당 부분 유사한 점, ③ 피고인 역시 수사과정에서 ‘평소 집에 가는 길에 구로시장을 자주 지나갔고, 술에 취해 기억이 나지 않지만 피해자가 만졌다고 하면 그 말이 맞겠다’는 취지로 진술하였던 점 등을 종합하면, 피고인이 원심 판시와 같이 피해자를 강제추행한 사실을 넉넉히 인정할 수 있다.

The judgment of the court below to the same purport is just, and there is no illegality as claimed by the defendant in this part of the judgment of the court below.

The defendant's ground of appeal on this part is without merit.

According to the records of judgment on the assertion of mental disorder, it is recognized that the defendant was drinking at the time of each of the crimes in this case.

However, according to the evidence adopted by the court below, the following are revealed.